Former Juul exec alleges company shipped tainted nicotine cartridges

The lawsuit does not specify the contamination issue or how it occurred. Lawyers for Breja declined to elaborate on the issue Wednesday.

A Juul spokesperson said in a statement that the claims are “baseless” and Breja was terminated because he failed to “demonstrate the leadership qualities” required for the job.

Juul, the bestselling e-cigarette brand in the U.S., has been besieged by criticism amid allegations of underage vaping.

The company faces multiple investigations by federal and state officials as well as lawsuits by families of teenagers who claim they became hooked on nicotine through the company’s vapes.

Breja worked in Juul’s global finance department less than 10 months. The lawsuit, filed in the Northern District of California, seeks damages for lost salary, bonuses and Juul stock, which it values at more than $10 million.

BuzzFeed News first reported the lawsuit.

Breja describes a “reckless” and “win-at-all costs” culture at Juul, primarily driven by the company’s former CEO, Kevin Burns, who was replaced as in a management shakeup last month.

In March, Breja said he learned some batches of nicotine solution used in the company’s mint pods had been contaminated. Breja claims company management shipped roughly one million pods affected by the issue and failed to issue a recall or public announcement.

Juul’s spokesperson rejected Breja’s account saying the company “determined the product met all applicable specifications.”

When Breja protested the decision to ship the pods, the lawsuit alleges, his supervisor at Juul reminded him “stockholders would lose significant personal wealth should he make his concerns public.”

Breja claims he was wrongfully terminated for unrelated reasons the week after raising his concerns. Because he had worked at the company for less than a year, he did not receive company stock that his lawyers claim would be worth “eight figures at its current valuation.”

In an earlier conflict with Juul management, Breja said he urged executives to add expiration or “best by” dates to its flavoured pods.

The lawsuit claims Burns rejected the idea.

Juul’s website states its pods are intended for use “soon after purchase.”

Last month, Burns was replaced by K.C. Crosthwaite, a former executive for Altria, the Big Tobacco firm that owns a 35 per cent stake in privately held Juul.

In the last two years, the San Francisco company has become the target of a nationwide backlash against e-cigarettes, with parents, politicians and health advocates blaming the firm for the recent vaping craze among young people.

According to the latest government survey, more than 1 in 4 high school students reported using e-cigarettes in the previous month despite federal law banning sales to those under 18.

In a separate health issue, federal officials are investigating more than 1,600 cases in the U.S. of lung damage linked to vaping, including nearly three dozen deaths. Many patients said they vaped THC, marijuana’s intoxicating chemical, but officials have not yet implicated any single product or ingredient.

Juul has made a series of voluntary concessions in an effort to weather the firestorm. It’s halted advertising and suspended sales of its fruit and dessert flavoured pods. The company continues to sell mint, menthol and tobacco flavours.

The Trump administration announced plans last month to remove virtually all vaping flavours from the market, leaving only tobacco.

But public health advocates are concerned the administration could back away from its plan to ban mint and menthol, the most popular flavours among youth.

On Monday, more than 50 health groups, including the American Lung Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics, released a letter sent to first lady Melania Trump urging the administration to follow through on its initial proposal.

“If the goal is to remove the e-cigarettes that are most attractive to youth, any proposal that ignores mint and menthol flavours falls short,” the groups stated.